I'm so on the outside, it's almost like I'm on the inside. "Les extremes, ils se touchent."

So, yeah, "Cloverfield". That was some scary shit.
What more are you allowed to ask from a movie about a ginormous monster rampaging though New York? You don't ask for a quality education from the public school system, you don't ask for affection from a Korean masseusse, and you don't ask for intelligence from "Godzilla" meets "The Blair Witch Project." Some things in life are that simple.
Still, the sad report from the new millenium can be gleaned from "Cloverfield". First of all, it's fitting that J.J. Abrams' name pops up more often than that of its director, Matt Reeves- this kind of movie isn't directed, but "produced". A bunch of guys (sadly, it's almost always guys) sit around a table, get loaded on fast-food and energy-jolt drinks, and plan for maximum commercial viability. The odd innocence of the Godzilla movies is gone. Godzilla arose out of a sense of atomic awe, emerged out of Hiroshima and Nagasaki in his frightened, destructive path, but there was something almost optimistic about the way he eventually became a protector of sorts- in the same way that that mushroom cloud is a talisman against its repetition.
The creature in "Cloverfield" is, of course, born out of September 11, and the movie is keyed on to the fact that the devastation of New York is no longer impossible or implausible: Heck, it's ALREADY hapenned. But you won't get a sense of purpose from "Cloverfield" because its (AMAZING) images are all it has to offer. It's tempting to think that the film-makers were after some sort of commentary about SOMETHING (militarism, post-9/11 fears, excessive reliance on technology), and that's a delusion they will gladly encourage, and I'm sure they believe it, but it's still a delusion. This movie is about SCARY SHIT GOING DOWN.
That it does, but it's not as original as it thinks. The Statue of Liberty destroyed? Again? Isn't that one of the most hackneyed images of Imperialist failure? Sure, it worked in "Planet of the Apes", and I liked how it was done in "Across the Universe", but this is something that's EXPECTED to happen. For once I would like to see a monster bring down the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, while devastated on-lookers break down in tears: "Oh, NOOOOO! Jimi Hendrix's scarf! America will never be the same!"

ABOVE: Both Some Dude and Some Chick showed great range of dramatic ability. The Academy should be paying attention!
Let's gloss over "Cloverfield"'s dino-cockroach-octopus-spider-snail-whatever-monster. While it's no different from the ones that crawled out of "The Mist" it's so FREAKING HUGE that I'll gladly admit its coolness.
Let me comment instead on the self-documenting fetish that fuels "Cloverfield"'s logic; an eye-to-eye conversation is so impossible for this monstrous cast that a girl will give her tearful valediction to a camera while the departing boy is IN THE NEXT FREAKING ROOM!!! This movie is an advertisement for both indestructible Sony Handycams and emotional retardation. One has to wonder what is going on with people who, when confronted with hordes of monsters, ensure it all ends on tape. (In case they don't get ate up and can sell the footage to CBS Evening News?) Forget about the FUCKING CAMERA and RUN WHILE SCREAMING OBSCENITIES like REAL HUMAN BEINGS!
Yes, the documentary aspects of "Cloverfield" are strained- but I doubt its intended target will feel the same. (They're probably recording choice clips of the movie on their cellphones and sending it to their friends.) It's never real if it's not down on a screen. It's always gotten my gall how audiences invited to the live taping of a TV show will often NOT LOOK AT THE LIVE TAPING and look at the TV monitors instead... Darned fools, unable to relate to anything but the glow of their machines. No wonder they all shoot each other down and then feel disappointed when it doesn't look as cool as in "Medal of Honor"
I told you, I'm 90 years old.
In all fairness, inappropriate documentation has been a boon to the horror genre from its very origins:
"September 28, 1867- I write these words as the darkness nears; I can hear the scratching outside the door; there is no time, the creature, that CREATURE of abominable abhorrence reaches its tentacles towards me and aaaarrgghhh it is killing me arrrgggh ripping me apart aarrggghhh ooh there goes my inkwell acccckkkk must finish diary entry..."





Alvis Rockett (lead singer, guitar): “Green Fairies” is highly conceptual, Matt brought in paintings by all these French guys to the session, and the songs were supposed to feel like Impressionistic, right, like it’s a bunch of rocking dots and you gotta walk back before you get the whole big idea, like a cinema of sound or something. It’s been really informative too. Like did you know that Monet and Manet are two different guys? That was pretty eye-opening. That said, “Testimony” is one of our fastest songs, and it’s about some pretty psychotic shit. When Matt wrote that I was all like: “Awesome, man, that’s pretty anti-establishment”, but he had this weird look on, like: “You don’t understand the pain in my soul”. Hahaha, that Matt, he sure is a kooky guy.
Matthew Porfirio (main lyricist, bass, backward-talking aliens in “Testimony”): So this French girl, my copine I’m supposed to call her, she smuggled in some bottles of absinthe from Lyon, and so I was inspired to write songs that I dedicated to, in order, Manet, Monet and Toulose Lautrec. (We also wrote a song called “Degas”- that may be a bonus track in the next one.) It’s like I told Alvis, we’ve become part of an artistic tradition in which the visual and the aural arts are linked to each other, and that’s why we’re almost VISIONARY, even if we’re working with sound- SOUNDANARY would be more appropriate. By the way, there’s been some fascinating research about absinthe and its rumored properties, scientists used to believe that this drug called ‘thujone’ was the cause of hallucinations. It turns out they were wrong, and the thing about absinthe? It’s alcohol by the gallon. 140-proof. No wonder I was seeing the face of my ex-girlfriend, Betty, all in green, hovering above my bed for like three nights. It was disturbing but made me realize maybe that wound hasn’t healed.
Helen Sandborg (drummer, temperance activist): If I hear Matt talk about being a SOUNDANARY one more time I’m going to jab him in the eye with my drumstick.

So there just was some brou-ha-ha when Annie Leibowitz (unwittingly?) let the genie lose in a set of "Vanity Fair" pictures that show Miley Cirus artsily naked (and waaaay closer to her big daddy than any teenage girl should be). Miley, who've been originally "proud" of the shoot, is now "embarrassed". I'm not surprised some inane pop tart has a backbone like Quasimodo's, I'm just surprised at all the people who were upset because the photos were "too sexy."





























